ForensicShield Education gives graduate students the same defensibility analysis forensic practitioners trust — then builds the revision and cross-examination loop around it. Upload. Analyze. Revise. Practice. Repeat.
A completed or in-progress forensic evaluation (PDF or DOCX) goes into the HIPAA-compliant education container, virus-scanned and encrypted at rest before processing. The student retains full ownership.
Methodology adequacy, language precision, citation integrity, construct validity, and jurisdiction-specific admissibility (Daubert, Frye, or other) are reviewed in parallel, then a consensus pass weighs the findings — the same engine practitioners use, not a simplified academic version.
Findings are organized by severity and category, each with an explanation of why opposing counsel would target it. Every citation carries a VERIFIED or UNVERIFIED status with a source link where available.
Each finding includes context and a suggestion framed as a consideration rather than a directive. Instructors receive a summary mapped to the course rubric, with class-level analytics. Visibility is role-scoped to enrolled courses.
Resubmitting a revised version of the same report within 30 days produces a comparison view of which findings were addressed, which remain, and whether new issues appeared — without consuming an additional analysis credit.
The AI plays opposing counsel, building questions from the specific vulnerabilities in that report — the instruments selected, the opinions expressed, and how conclusions were framed. No instructor needs to prepare adversarial questions.
ForensicShield Education is having trouble loading.
Try refreshing the page, disabling browser extensions (especially ad blockers), or using a different browser.
Contact support if this persists.